Thought I posted this, however I can't find it. I have played on a server that has mix of Combat MIisions and the Sector control Missions. Both are great, but with Sector Missions added it takes same oh! same oh! missions to be not as boring. Just a suggestion.

---

I agree with this, although I'm sure our servers will probably never be changed.

---

___________Fireteam Zulu | Graphics Team Leader | SFC____________

youll get the same answer us BC2 players got; simply, " its not going to change "

we have asked forever to have a server that alternates rush and conquest.

---

New Siggy; What do you think?

Well, that's dictatorship for you. You donate money. They don't let you decide.

Umm that was already change earlier today...  

GOA.Luke*BK*

---

wah?! i guess "certain" people have to get tired of it for things to finally change ^_^

oh well maybe if we stand on one foot and cross our fingers maybe something will happen with the bc2 servers xD

---

New Siggy; What do you think?

MOH is now playing (as of yesterday when I was on) Sector Control and Combat Mission.

Thanks for mixing it up Luke, gives everyone a chance to experience the different game modes without having to leave our server to do so.

---

MOH is still not final on how we will set it up. Like BC2 and W@W we try something give it a few weeks then consider something new. Until we find a good fit.

GOA.Luke*BK*

---

Sinister wrote (View Post):

Well, that's dictatorship for you. You donate money. They don't let you decide.

Is this really necessary?

tet wrote (View Post):

Sinister wrote (View Post):

Well, that's dictatorship for you. You donate money. They don't let you decide.

Is this really necessary?

No, it's not.  Veiled sniping (or in some cases, not so veiled) accomplishes nothing and does nothing but bring bad feelings to everyone.  If you have a problem, then approach the person you have a problem with PRIVATELY and try to work it out.  There is no need for everyone to get dragged into whatever bad feelings, ill will drama that might be going on for a small handful of people.

If you want to effect change, then do it constructively.  No matter what anyone in a leadership position does in their decision making process, it's not going to make every single player happy.  It's just not possible.  That means that sometimes everyone is going to have to compromise or is not going to get their perceived ideal set-up.  I believe that the BK leadership does the best that they can and takes into account the group's best interests when making their decisions.  I'm sure there will come a time when I'm going to disagree with something, but ya know what?  When that happens, I will voice my opinion CONSTRUCTIVELY and abide by whatever the final outcome is.  If I have a personal issue, then I will approach whoever I have the problem with and say so PRIVATELY.

This is ridiculous.  Stop the drama.

---

Sinister wrote (View Post):

Well, that's dictatorship for you. You donate money. They don't let you decide.

Sinister you really shouldn't be upset about clan politics... I mean come on... it's just a darn game...

---

___________Fireteam Zulu | Graphics Team Leader | SFC____________

Thanks "LUKE" for my .02 worth, you "STILL" have the "BEST SERVER ON THE NET"

---

I agree with Nam, thanks Luke. We shall try the server this way for a bit. See what works, like Luke said.

---

Vrai A La Fin

Piperchick. If you don't know everything that happened over the year of my BK membership, don't judge me. You have no right to play the better man.

Tet, no it's not, I'm just trolling.

Immolation, a clan should be a democracy, even if its just for fun.

Congratulations on changing the servers to the clans liking.

That wouldn't work, especially with a clan of this size. And even so, you still shouldn't be so upset about clan politics.

---

___________Fireteam Zulu | Graphics Team Leader | SFC____________