Joined: Jul 26, 2007
Posts: 9910
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
We want to know what you like about server 1 and what you don't like. Give us your list but also tell us if you could only change one thing what would it be.
GOA.Luke*BK*
Joined: Feb 13, 2012
Posts: 145
I do not like the TDM maps. They are pointless and are just a giant frag fest. I DO like the size. 24-32 in my opinion is optimum. It's not too crowded this way. If we can reduce the amount of TDM, add more conquest, and maybe bump it up to 32 player, it would be the perfect server. The 64 man server is just too crowded. Can't spawn without dying, just a flood of people. Server 1 is way better than 2.
Joined: Nov 18, 2010
Posts: 399
Location: Florida, USA
I think mix mode is bad for keeping the population consistently high. I think Conquest should not be running on server 1, when it is running 24/7 on server 2.
Joined: Oct 03, 2010
Posts: 2001
Location: Kentucky
Joined: Dec 10, 2009
Posts: 1713
Location: Quebec, Canada
One thing I do think is worth a try; quit playing the same map twice and flipping sides. I know that is the norm with BF3 but we didnt do that in BO and our servers were always full. Play the map and the game mode once and then switch to the next.
Fully agree with that, even on server 2.
“ Carpe Diem Quam Minimum Credula Postero “
Joined: Sep 25, 2009
Posts: 2527
Location: Taos Missouri
I have to agree we could do without Conquest on Server 1
I like TDM, I think 64 man TDM would be fun on a small map (right Heiden)
I like Rush
Would like SQDM also but I can’t find how the other 32 man servers are set up.
If I could change one thing it would be set it up on a 24/7 map like Metro with no explosives or a 24/7 Grand Bazaar all weapons and Conquest which goes against my first comment. I know a few of the 24/7 one map servers I play on are popular but not always full 24/7. They have their time slots when they are full. the no explosives would require running a plug in to kick people for the use of explosives I think. or it could be just active admins running the server I played on.
I think it would be worth a try.
Just my to cents
(EDITx2) BTW I like playing both sides on a map, with auto balance running you could get stuck on the bad side of the map for several rotations. we all know that on some maps one team has the advantage.
Joined: Feb 09, 2010
Posts: 121
Location: Canada
I myself only first experienced TDM on BF3 the other day on server 1, and I found it to be a blast. I mean it is sort of a frag fest, but it is nice for a change from conquest. My opinion of it being 24/7 one map though differs from Karows' . I would like to see the map change (perhaps even play every single map available) Maybe though just play the map once and forget about switching sides. Who knows, with all the new DLC coming out for BF3, maybe we will have it dedicated close quarters for infantry battles and what not. (No vehicles maybe) Anyways that is how I feel about the current rotation. Leave it or change I don't care really except for the few things I mentioned earlier on in my post. Mixed mode is really nice for a change.
Joined: Feb 24, 2011
Posts: 537
Joined: Jun 24, 2010
Posts: 117
NO conquest, explosives, & vehicles.
Mix Mode: Rush, Team Deathmatch, Squad Deathmatch (you can do it with up to 32 players, not just 16)
"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle." -Abraham Lincoln
Joined: May 31, 2011
Posts: 2631
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
With me strongly disliking Rush mode, and player with more than 40 people, I rarely play in our servers during the day, lately..
I mis the old server #3.
Anyway, Rush mode seems to creep up more than the rest, but that may be due to poor timing on my part. iI always have a fine connection to it. Mixed mode is always nice, though. But with the 24 player limit, Infantry only would be nice. Squad DM, DM or FFA are just fine, I just wish the gameplay areas were a bit bigger.. say, 20-30% - but I find I prefer Conquest, overall. And I like map variety, but I'm not 100% opposed to a one-map idea, but I'm sure we'd get sick of it before long, and since opinions differ so much, picking one single map for permanency would be a tough choice... I couldn't even suggest one.
Sp o guess my feedback is... to varied, to be helpful.
-- Of all the soles I've ever tasted, his had the most ....cumin. --
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Posts: 1934
Location: Northampton, UK
I would like to stick with Mix-Mode for all game types with the following change:
* all maps to be played ONCE except Rush
This gives you a chance to play both sides unless you are auto-balanced. Playing both sides on conquest is just too long and changing maps keeps me interested.
I'd also like to get on the winning side of SDM to complete the assignment
Joined: Jan 11, 2011
Posts: 87
Location: Piatra Neamt, Romania
My biggest complaint is Conquest. I like playing on 1 to get away from large vehicle dominant maps, then it cycles to the same thing on one, and I just lose all enthusiasm.
I like RUSH, I love TDM.
BF1 STATS
Joined: Jul 05, 2011
Posts: 23
I love TDM gotta keep it, would like to see different maps with tdm
Joined: Mar 13, 2011
Posts: 2064
Location: Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada
I agree with MysteryShot....TDM with different maps.